Journal article
Six-month outcomes after restrictive or liberal transfusion for cardiac surgery
CD Mazer, RP Whitlock, DA Fergusson, E Belley-Cote, K Connolly, B Khanykin, AJ Gregory, E De Medicis, FM Carrier, S McGuinness, PJ Young, K Byrne, JC Villar, A Royse, HP Grocott, MD Seeberger, C Mehta, F Lellouche, GMT Hare, TW Painter Show all
New England Journal of Medicine | MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC | Published : 2018
Abstract
BACKGROUND We reported previously that, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive transfusion strategy was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or 28 days after surgery, whichever came first. We now report the clinical outcomes at 6 months after surgery. METHODS We randomly assigned 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery to a restrictive red-cell transfusion strategy (transfusion if the hemoglobin concentration was <7.5 g per deciliter intraoperatively or postoperatively) or a liberal ..
View full abstractGrants
Awarded by Health Research Council of New Zealand
Funding Acknowledgements
Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; TRICS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02042898.)